<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Photojournalism &#8211; Is it Still Viable? Episode 17</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.polarizingimages.com/photojournalism-is-it-still-viable-episode-17/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.polarizingimages.com/photojournalism-is-it-still-viable-episode-17/</link>
	<description>Three Guys Discussing the Philosophy of Photography</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 02:39:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivan</title>
		<link>http://www.polarizingimages.com/photojournalism-is-it-still-viable-episode-17/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 16:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polarizingimages.com/?p=252#comment-37</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What follows is a highly disorganized comment about flower shots and pictures of pretty ladies (and men). In regard to the latter, there was this Joe McNally quote for the April 11 show:

&lt;em&gt;Many of the pix out there on the internet are such a no-frills, in-your-face slam dunk of plastic sexiness that the creator with his camera seems not to be an inquisitive, interested gentleman, but more like a drunk at a bar sidling up to a hot chick and blurting out, ‘Wanna boff?&lt;/em&gt;

Some things are just very pretty, and if a photographer wants to shoot those things, it&#039;s going to be a lot harder to fail to get an attractive image. Of course, a bad photographer &lt;em&gt;can&lt;/em&gt; fail, but even a merely competent photographer can create an image that moves people. Yes, a photo of an eagle or of a naked woman on a beach may be unimaginative, and it may not win any photography awards for technique or originality, but that doesn&#039;t make the image (or the photographer) bad if the picture works for the viewer. Such viewers might include myself!

I&#039;m sometimes surprised when casual snaps I&#039;ve taken turn out to be popular with folks on Facebook or Flickr. I&#039;m also surprised (though, less so) when some of my quirky art projects turn out to get no reaction at all. :P Cultivating a higher aesthetic is good, and I&#039;m not suggesting we lower our sights, but we shouldn&#039;t be excessively snobby about what other people like. And if another photographer is shooting with super hot models on south Pacific beaches where failure is almost impossible, good for him/her!

BTW, I think that some photos I once thought of as magnificent now look uninteresting or flawed, so my personal taste in photography has changed over time. I wonder if this phenomenon gives a competitive advantage to artists who are still in touch with their original tastes.

I have seen a few images that effectively span the divide between quirky aesthetics and brute-force beauty. Helmut Newton, for sure. I think I should spend more time figuring out how to make such images.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What follows is a highly disorganized comment about flower shots and pictures of pretty ladies (and men). In regard to the latter, there was this Joe McNally quote for the April 11 show:</p>
<p><em>Many of the pix out there on the internet are such a no-frills, in-your-face slam dunk of plastic sexiness that the creator with his camera seems not to be an inquisitive, interested gentleman, but more like a drunk at a bar sidling up to a hot chick and blurting out, ‘Wanna boff?</em></p>
<p>Some things are just very pretty, and if a photographer wants to shoot those things, it&#8217;s going to be a lot harder to fail to get an attractive image. Of course, a bad photographer <em>can</em> fail, but even a merely competent photographer can create an image that moves people. Yes, a photo of an eagle or of a naked woman on a beach may be unimaginative, and it may not win any photography awards for technique or originality, but that doesn&#8217;t make the image (or the photographer) bad if the picture works for the viewer. Such viewers might include myself!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sometimes surprised when casual snaps I&#8217;ve taken turn out to be popular with folks on Facebook or Flickr. I&#8217;m also surprised (though, less so) when some of my quirky art projects turn out to get no reaction at all. <img src='http://www.polarizingimages.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' />  Cultivating a higher aesthetic is good, and I&#8217;m not suggesting we lower our sights, but we shouldn&#8217;t be excessively snobby about what other people like. And if another photographer is shooting with super hot models on south Pacific beaches where failure is almost impossible, good for him/her!</p>
<p>BTW, I think that some photos I once thought of as magnificent now look uninteresting or flawed, so my personal taste in photography has changed over time. I wonder if this phenomenon gives a competitive advantage to artists who are still in touch with their original tastes.</p>
<p>I have seen a few images that effectively span the divide between quirky aesthetics and brute-force beauty. Helmut Newton, for sure. I think I should spend more time figuring out how to make such images.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grammar-Nazi</title>
		<link>http://www.polarizingimages.com/photojournalism-is-it-still-viable-episode-17/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Grammar-Nazi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 03:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polarizingimages.com/?p=252#comment-35</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the comments, gentlemen. They are appreciated. 

I just attended this weekend a fascinating show at a local art gallery called &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.facebook.com/pages/Studio-b-Light-Impressions/321674474547306&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Light Impressions&lt;/a&gt;, a touring exhibit by studio b. from Florida that features 40 iPhone photographers with their work displayed on 40 iPads. I plan to put a blog post about the exhibit later this week, but until then, click on the link to go to its facebook page.
&lt;hr&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comments, gentlemen. They are appreciated. </p>
<p>I just attended this weekend a fascinating show at a local art gallery called <a href="https://www.facebook.com/pages/Studio-b-Light-Impressions/321674474547306" rel="nofollow">Light Impressions</a>, a touring exhibit by studio b. from Florida that features 40 iPhone photographers with their work displayed on 40 iPads. I plan to put a blog post about the exhibit later this week, but until then, click on the link to go to its facebook page.</p>
<hr />
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.polarizingimages.com/photojournalism-is-it-still-viable-episode-17/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 14:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polarizingimages.com/?p=252#comment-34</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks - I will check his stuff out.
&lt;hr&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks &#8211; I will check his stuff out.</p>
<hr />
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.polarizingimages.com/photojournalism-is-it-still-viable-episode-17/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 14:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polarizingimages.com/?p=252#comment-33</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The whole idea of composing, or &lt;i&gt;seeing&lt;/i&gt;, the picture before you even look through the view finder is something I am a big proponent of; it has helped with the quality of the pictures I shoot. By forcing myself to see the image first, I know what I am trying to compose in the camera and that allows me to start making minute adjustments in my position so that I can realize the image I have in my mind.

For several genres, that&#039;s not always possible - wedding photography comes to mind along with photojournalism and, to a lesser extent, sports photography. At best, we can put ourselves in a physical position where we can get the image we envision, even if we can&#039;t arrange the main elements.

And, yeah, Grammar Nazi was an excellent guest - look for him again in a few weeks!
&lt;hr&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The whole idea of composing, or <i>seeing</i>, the picture before you even look through the view finder is something I am a big proponent of; it has helped with the quality of the pictures I shoot. By forcing myself to see the image first, I know what I am trying to compose in the camera and that allows me to start making minute adjustments in my position so that I can realize the image I have in my mind.</p>
<p>For several genres, that&#8217;s not always possible &#8211; wedding photography comes to mind along with photojournalism and, to a lesser extent, sports photography. At best, we can put ourselves in a physical position where we can get the image we envision, even if we can&#8217;t arrange the main elements.</p>
<p>And, yeah, Grammar Nazi was an excellent guest &#8211; look for him again in a few weeks!</p>
<hr />
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rudeboy77-Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.polarizingimages.com/photojournalism-is-it-still-viable-episode-17/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>rudeboy77-Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 16:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polarizingimages.com/?p=252#comment-32</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Check out the work Of  A William Schimidt.. Really great photos..
&lt;hr&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out the work Of  A William Schimidt.. Really great photos..</p>
<hr />
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rudeboy77-Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.polarizingimages.com/photojournalism-is-it-still-viable-episode-17/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>rudeboy77-Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 15:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polarizingimages.com/?p=252#comment-31</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Use your feet instead of the zoom--very good point.  I compose my photo before I even look in the  view finder so I need to get up close to get that shot I have in my head. I was  A guest on TAI  a bit back ago and had the great Pleasure Of the funny talker asking me REAL CHEESE or CHEESE WIZ-- I pick Real.. he was not happy.. great Job Grammar  Man..
&lt;hr&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Use your feet instead of the zoom&#8211;very good point.  I compose my photo before I even look in the  view finder so I need to get up close to get that shot I have in my head. I was  A guest on TAI  a bit back ago and had the great Pleasure Of the funny talker asking me REAL CHEESE or CHEESE WIZ&#8211; I pick Real.. he was not happy.. great Job Grammar  Man..</p>
<hr />
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
